Posts tagged Twitter
Why we need social media
Jul 8th
Digital interaction is an interesting thing, isn’t it? Through Twitter, we have meaningful conversations with people we only know only online. Our Facebook accounts reconnect us with friendships we previously thought were lost to time. We carry our friends with us wherever we go and thrive on the capability for instant interactions. Some of us are reliving our past, while others of us are making business connections. In the process, many of us have broadened our definition of a “friend” to include those people we have just met and we share the most unremarkable parts of our lives as if these friends were “long lost,” rather than “newly made.”
We humans are social animals, of course. Most of us like engage with others so that we can have an understanding of where we fit into the fabric of our culture. Yet we Americans, in particular, are finding ourselves growing disconnected from those around us. We overwhelm ourselves with extracurricular activities to occupy our time, we work too much and relax too little, and we focus on getting “things” done, rather than experience doing “things.” Overall, we have lost the personal connections to the people in America who make our “stuff,” grow our food, or frankly, those who live next door. It is almost as if our individual desires for personal independence and self-reliance have eclipsed our need for social interaction. They have not, of course. Our requirements of social interactions are just different now from before.
Today, we try to balance our individual desires with our need for social interaction by leveraging digital technologies into the mix to help us maintain our personal connections in the lulls of our daily living. We all do it, but some of us do it better. It seems to me that each generation appears to connect and build relationships differently using technology. For example, I have observed that Millennials use social media as a way of extending their daily interactions with their friends. With their mobility restricted by expansive neighborhoods and overprotective parents while growing, they had no choice but to explore new online social technologies as a way to maintain their friendships. As a result, communicating by text, Facebook or MySpace is the same as a phone call or a face-to-face conversation. Social media, and the digital technologies that supports it, are fully integrated into the life of most Millennials.
Observations of Generation X show me that they rely heaviest on cell phones for social interaction, I suspect because most were in college when mobile phones became affordable for and adopted by the masses. Texting and social media tools appear to be time-consumers that this Generation has not yet fully embraced. Instead, they are practical about the use of social media, engaging with those pieces that benefit them most (such as using Twitter to build business relationships), disengaging when there is little personal gain.
Baby Boomers appear to function best using face-to-face, phone and email communications, but are rapidly adopting Facebook. I think, they can “see” their friends and feel engaged in those lives as if they lived next door. This closeness is important to Boomers, especially as they age, because it seems to provide Boomers true “social” opportunities in the context of their primary interests: connecting with old friends, sharing political news and views, discussing religion and exploring hobbies.
Each generation has found a way to make social media technologies relevant to their own lives, to give us opportunities to connect with others regularly, as we allow our culture to put increasing demands on our time. The ability for us to bend and mold social media tools to our individual needs, values, and expectations is what makes it work so well in building and re-building our valued connections.
We need social media tools to help us maintain our ability to be human in the face of the demands made on us by our culture, our peers, and ourselves. These tools are now such an essential part of how we function as individuals and who we are together as a community, that living without social media and supporting technologies is unthinkable.
It is clear to me that social media allows us to maintain some degree of sanity in our lives. Without these tools, we would give up what little socialization we do enjoy; and I am not so sure that would be good for our minds, or our souls.
Attached Files:
|
|
0.0 |
Digital is not a channel; it’s a life-connection tool.
Jun 8th
At the 2009 International Licensing Expo, I watched intently as people from all over the world walked up and down the aisles with their faces literally buried in their smart phones. There were hundreds of exhibitors, featuring some of the most exciting ideas and concepts in the Licensing Industry; yet, I’m sure many good opportunities were lost or simply overlooked because those exhibiting didn’t make an effort to connect with the lives of those attending. Most exhibitors simply were not in the “life stream” of the attendees.
I decided to try a little social media experiment at the Licensing Expo to see if we could get into the attendees life stream and create personal engagement. We advertised our presence on Twitter in print and on signs in the booth, we engaged followers of the Licensing Expo Twitter feed (#LX9) on the floor, and we brought a magician to the booth to create a different life experience on the show floor.
Were we successful?
Our Twitter follower numbers are up modestly since the advertisements began to appear, but the real success comes from the buzz we generated on the show floor. We tweeted multiple times a day, awarding prizes, sharing memorable visits and talking about our booth activities. The folks at the Licensing Expo and others took notice and retweeted. Many booth visitors said the tweets were the reason for stopping.
It seems that we were not only successful in getting into the life stream of attendees, but once we gained their attention we also did well to create a memorable experience (with our magician) when they engaged. This good memory we helped to create launched many deeper conversations about our brand and our opportunities. Although, had we not made good use of the moment when we captured their attention, attendees would have been off to the next thing.
Some have said this was a successful use of the digital channel, or perhaps savvy social media marketing. Maybe, although I no longer believe in marketing channel silos when it comes to building customer relationships (see my 2003 whitepaper, Customers are Channel Neutral for details). Customers effortlessly move between channels, so our old definitions are no longer truly relevant-except to say that the customer experience must be consistent regardless of when and where the customer connects. Today, marketers must subtly connect, be accepted in the life stream, and engage with passion so that it creates a memory for the customer. So, it was not the use of the social media that mattered in our experiment, rather it was the memory we helped to create. Social media and digital technologies are only tools to help spread the message. What is most important for marketers to remember is simply: great stories and memorable experiences spread quickly to build brands–the channel and the tools are irrelevant.
With people from all over the world attending, the Licensing Expo provided a microcosm of what is happening in our culture. Our personal and work lives are intertwined and we engage both regardless of our location. Life is no longer exclusively defined by what is happening in our physical presence. For many of us it resides in the palm of our hands and is illuminated by a tiny screen. As marketers, we must adapt to these changes without being intrusive or obnoxious if we are to keep our brands relevant.
As I see it, this ever-present digital and wireless connection to the world can no longer be called a “channel.” Digital technologies simply and effortlessly extend the connections in our lives; and life connections are not channel dependant.
Attached Files:
|
|
0.0 |
Social Media: This, too, will change.
May 29th
I have always been an early adopter of technology. I like change and I get a bit of an adrenaline rush working with and figuring out new tools and toys. Unfortunately, there are a good number of my friends and family who do not understand some of the newer social media enablers. Twitter cannot be explained to most of them and some flat-out refuse to use Facebook. Others, I am sad to say, carry a cell phone, but cannot manage to “Text.” These are the same people who could not believe I would carry a BlackBerry® and answer emails after working hours, yet they now do the same. Times, and people, do change.
The use of these electronic tools for conversation isn’t as really the time-waster they insist it is. Frankly, I prefer to think of these tools as “time-enablers” instead of a “time-wasters.” Having a BlackBerry®, for example, allows me to take my work with me wherever I go. Whether it’s soccer games, band or chorus concerts, or business trips, I can easily bridge the time between work, play and life most of the time. This means I probably work more hours than the average person does, but I work differently. I like the freedom. After all, it’s all “life,” isn’t it?
Facebook allows me to keep up with my kids and friends while traveling on business or otherwise away from the PC. Twitter opens the doors to ideas and conversations that I would never have if I only talked to the people in my every-day business dealings. For those of us with intense curiosity and a burning desire to continue to learn new things, Twitter is the source of unbelievable amounts of useful information, shared by people with similar passions—even for a skimmer of tweets like me.
In a 2003 blog entry, “The trouble with cell phones,” I shared that my friend Roger might have been on to something when he suggested, “…cell phones have replaced cigarettes as a nervous habit. People pull out their cell phones, call others when they feel bored or need to kill 5 minutes or so, and didn’t plan ahead with some reading material.” Today, this has been replaced with texting, email, Facebook and Twitter. Tomorrow, it will be something else. As someone commented recently, given the choice people would rather be doing something than doing nothing. Mobile technologies allow us to do something all of the time—productive or not.
Technology has obviously evolved since 2003 when cell phones were the primary source of mobile conversations. While we still use cell phones, we use them differently. We talk little and text often. Technology and our use of will constantly evolve and morph into the next generation of tools. Think about it: the “shared applications,” mainframe-thinking of the 70’s evolved into tools like Google Apps and cloud computing discussions; AOL’s IM chat communities of the 90’s and classmates.com have evolved into today’s Facebook; and ASP program models of the 2000’s have evolved into the Software as a Service (SaaS) program models of today. The technology changed, sure. But, it was the users of the technology who drove those changes.
Knowing all of these things, it’s hard for me to imagine that a few short years from now what we call “Social Media” and the technology that supports it, will not have undergone a major transformation for the better. It will do so because of the users. Users of these tools already desire a more streamlined ways to improve communications with others. I have to believe that users will demand better integration of these tools to make their lives easier through increased mobility. This will allow the conversations to continue and the relationships to build all day, every day. Will this mean stronger, better relationships? Maybe. Only time will tell.
I am certain of two things, though. One: Everything about technology and social media interaction will continue to evolve. For those of us who are early adopters, we gain great insights into how that evolution may occur. Two: My friends, who don’t understand Twitter today, won’t understand the next step in the evolution either. Unfortunately, they will find themselves farther and farther behind; not just with technology, but also in their social interactions with others as many of their friends more readily adopt the changing way we communicate as a culture.
By know, we all should realize that, “this, too, will change.” Technology evolves. Communication methods evolve. Yet, people do not really evolve as much as they adapt. Either they drive such change by adopting, engaging, and sharing or they simply adapt to such change reluctantly in fear of being passed by.
Which will you do?
Thanks to @heathervescent with whom I had a Twitter conversation about emerging technology, which was the spark for this blog post.
BlackBerry® is a registered trademark of Research In Motion Limited.
Attached Files:
|
|
0.0 |
Are your customers loyal or lazy?
May 27th
“I don’t know whether I’m loyal, or lazy,” tweeted a friend of mine last week as his eye doctor ran more than 30 minutes behind. He seemed as frustrated with himself for not finding another provider, as he was with his doctor for wasting his time. Granted, there may have been a patient emergency or an unforeseen situation with that caused the delay; yet, others with appointments were expected to endure without being alerted to the problem and given the option to reschedule. While this particular situation is most prevalent with professional appointments, we all know of similar situations that occur in our own businesses and organizations.
Customer loyalty, like friendship, is built on a mutual understanding and acceptance of one another. At minimum, the relationship between the customer and the organization requires:
> Honesty
> Integrity
> Consideration
> Empathy
> Respect
> Humor (maybe not required, but certainly helpful)
While the customer easily gives these qualities, organizations with which they purport to have a relationship often do not reciprocate. From an organization’s perspective, a customer relationship is all too often built only on revenue generated. Specifically, the value of that relationship is measured on the number of purchases made and the size of those purchases. When a customer recognizes that their loyalty is measured only by these factors, such as with supermarket loyalty programs, they become fickle about the relationship. Laziness creeps in and whoever has the best sale prices or is closest to home gains the customer’s favor. When this happens, the relationship becomes a commodity for the customer, as it is already for the organization.
To prevent customer laziness, organizations need to think of customers more as friends, than as dollar signs. Put yourself in your customers’ shoes and ask yourself the same questions you might ask about your friendships, for example:
Do my customers…
1. Feel like they’re “my only customer” whenever we get together?
2. Talk about our relationship in a positive light with their other friends?
3. Tell me when I’ve done something wrong and give me an opportunity to make it right?
4. Share their lives and stories with me because they know I care about them and the relationship?
5. Count on me to deliver whenever they’re in need?
6. Desire to spend more time with me and take every opportunity to do so—wherever I may be?
7. Show passion about our relationship (brand)?
8. Believe that every action I take is in their best interests?
9. Feel that they’re desired?
10. See tangible and long-term value our relationship?
If you can truthfully answer yes to most of these questions, your customer relationships—and long-term customer loyalty—are in good shape. If not, you have some work to do.
Do keep in mind social media tools make it very easy to build and cultivate customer loyalty today. You can connect anywhere at any time and have a meaningful conversation with customers. There’s really no excuse for not putting time and effort into building these relationships. Not doing so will make it easy for the customer to decide if he’s really loyal, or just lazy.
Can you afford lazy customers? No, I didn’t think so.
Attached Files:
|
|
0.0 |
The non-interested followers
Apr 10th
Posted by 
Dave in Social Media
Using just 140 characters, folks are striking up conversations around world on a variety of topics and in “real time” with Twitter. If you are not already familiar with the tool, essentially users get a “platform” from which to speak about their passion (similar to a blog) that occurs at the speed of instant messaging. Like blogs, it creates a medium where everyone has a voice; like instant messaging, it is sometimes irreverent. (If you’re not familiar with Twitter, Fortune Magazine published an informative article in August 2008, The true meaning of Twitter.)
Once you have a Twitter account you’ll need to “follow” someone to get the most out of the tool. This means you’ll be listening (or reading) to what that person has to say. As an information junkie, I follow those who talk about things that interest me. Although, I have to admit following a hundred or so simultaneous conversations can sometimes be daunting. Nonetheless I learn new things daily, I’ve found a great breeding ground for new things to think about, and I find new sources of information relevant to my interests. Because these topics interest me, I can also contribute something to these conversations.
On the flip side, some may desire to follow you and here’s where it gets a little sticky. Not everyone thinks the way I do and follow people who engage in topics of interest. Some believe that it is the size of the network that’s important. I would like to think the general idea behind Twitter was “relevant conversations” with others; therefore the size of your network would be somewhat limited by those with similar interests. Unfortunately, like rabid “network marketers” some desire to follow solely so someone in your network may see them and investigate the latest “business opportunity” being pitched or product sold. Those people are simply trying to increase the size of their network. I dislike this approach, as it seems to me that the “follow” is somehow disingenuous.
Consider this: When you met your neighbor the first time, did you work to find common interests, or were you pitched all-purpose, non-toxic cleaning solutions that he or she happened to be selling? I dislike the latter and will avoid that neighbor for a while.
The same is true online, and especially with Twitter. It’s very easy to “unfollow” someone. You can also block your updates, as I do, so that you must approve everyone who follows you. I like this because it gives me the opportunity to manage my “implied endorsement” of those who follow me. I review every website and Twitter stream of every follow request, and make a conscious decision as to the “fit.” If there is not a fit, I decline.
Social media tools are specifically designed to build conversations. Think about it like talking with your neighbor across the back fence, only you’re talking across Internet. Shared ideas and interests are paramount to building personal credibility and friendships. Twitter and other online tools can accelerate credibility building, but they can destroy it just as quickly.
For me Twitter is not about building a large, non-interested following. It’s a waste of everyone’s time and erodes credibility of the followers. I hope those I follow feel the same way.
Attached Files:
|
|
2.8 (1 person) |
